The so-called "retraction" by the NY Times of its earlier claim that Henry Kissinger was to be counted among the opponents of the Bush policy re Iraq seems much ado about nothing. Basically, they admit to having blown a trivial point (whether Kissinger thought that something should be done about Iraq); obviously, the larger issue concerning the opinions of the former Sec'y of State was whether he supported the Bush policy of unilateralism, something the paper continues to accurately maintain in spite of the objections of the likudniks in DC.